←back to thread

858 points colesantiago | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.439s | source
Show context
Workaccount2 ◴[] No.45108892[source]
Firefox can still get money, and maybe Apple too. The ruling says they can pay for preload, but not for exclusivity.

Google also must share search data with competitors, but it's not totally clear what this is. The ruling mentions helping other engines with "long tail" queries.

All in all this seems like a pretty mild ruling, and an appeal can generally only help Google from a not to bad ruling at this point.

replies(5): >>45109423 #>>45109446 #>>45110250 #>>45111123 #>>45112203 #
mig39 ◴[] No.45109423[source]
Yeah, I don't think Google is the "exclusive" on either Apple OSes or Firefox. Just the default.
replies(3): >>45109808 #>>45110673 #>>45111791 #
1. johanyc ◴[] No.45110673[source]
> The decision said that Apple's deal with Google to be the default search engine was "exclusive" because it established Google as the default out-of-the-box search engine.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/09/02/apple-shares-rise-after-...

replies(1): >>45112749 #
2. johncolanduoni ◴[] No.45112749[source]
I’m confused what deals the court would accept as non-exclusive then. Do they have to randomize the default search engines when you first boot a new iPhone?