(www.cnbc.com)

858 points colesantiago | 1 comments | 02 Sep 25 20:26 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source

Show context

gausswho ◴[02 Sep 25 23:18 UTC] No.45110363[source]▶

Court's statements:

2024: "Google abused its monopoly position for search dominance"

2025: "Punishing Google now would be unreasonable because its dominance is under threat by AI"

Wrist slapped. Somebody got their bag. Over to you, EU.

1. bitpush ◴[02 Sep 25 23:33 UTC] No.45110482[source]▶

The whole point was the 'boy who cried wolf' - OMG, we're not able to compete with Google because they are a monopoly.

And then Sam Altman came and showed how to make a better product, and all of a sudden people are like, there's an alternative.

You're blaming Google for Bing and ddg's shitty products.

Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred from exclusive contracts