←back to thread

294 points AgaoAnar | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.527s | source
Show context
2OEH8eoCRo0 ◴[] No.45108785[source]
Have you measured the power consumption of your "high power consumption" server?
replies(3): >>45109039 #>>45109962 #>>45110348 #
jeffbee ◴[] No.45109039[source]
Seriously. You can get running states around 1W these days.
replies(3): >>45109835 #>>45110165 #>>45110346 #
1. shellwizard ◴[] No.45110346[source]
Are you talking about processor's C-states? My old 6th gen i3 stays most of the time idling around C8, averaging 5w, really impressive, I suppose newer gens will be even more efficient
replies(2): >>45111047 #>>45113492 #
2. jeffbee ◴[] No.45111047[source]
C8 is a good state if you can get it. Intel is really good at this. They don't even bother energizing the L3 caches immediately when exiting deep package C-states. But there are lots of conditions that will inhibit C8, notably an Ethernet link on a NIC capable of PTP. This is why wireless is better.
3. xioxox ◴[] No.45113492[source]
Although Intel processors are efficient, modern AMD processors have much higher idle power usage, due to their chiplet design. They typically use at least 20W more power.