←back to thread

858 points colesantiago | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Hansenq ◴[] No.45109151[source]
This seems like a very sensible and logical conclusion by the judge to me.

An exclusive contract with Apple/Samsung isn't great, but even Apple testified that they would not have accepted any other searcch engine because everyone else was worse. You can't make restrictions on what Apple is allowed to do because Google violated some law--if Apple wants to make Google the default, they should be allowed to do so! The ban on exclusive contracts makes sense though; they should not be allowed to use contracts to furthur their monopoly position.

And similarly with Chrome; it made no sense to bring Chrome into this equation. Google started, developed, and built Chrome into the best browser available today NOT through exclusive contracts, but because Chrome is just a better product. Users can switch to Firefox/Safari (Mac default)/Edge (Windows default); they don't because Chrome is better. Forcing Google to give up one of its best products is effectively eminent domain by the government to a private company.

With the rise of ChatGPT (I barely use Google anymore) and AI search engines potentially shifting the search landscape, who knows if Google will still be a monopoly 5 years from now. Software moves fast and the best solution to software monopoly is more software competition.

replies(14): >>45109213 #>>45109365 #>>45110031 #>>45110056 #>>45110177 #>>45110178 #>>45111329 #>>45111583 #>>45112619 #>>45112984 #>>45113110 #>>45113185 #>>45113218 #>>45118412 #
coliveira ◴[] No.45109365[source]
> but even Apple testified

Of course, Apple didn't want to lose its part in the ilegal scheme.

replies(1): >>45109733 #
scarface_74 ◴[] No.45109733[source]
Bing - you know the search engine by the struggling Trillion dollar market cap company - is free to match Google’s offer.
replies(2): >>45109816 #>>45109850 #
benoau ◴[] No.45109850[source]
Except Google's offer is funded by their (court-ruled) advertising monopoly... which neither Bing nor all other competitors combined can compete with.
replies(2): >>45109913 #>>45110021 #
crazygringo ◴[] No.45110021[source]
You really think Microsoft, a company worth $3.8 trillion, doesn't have enough money to pay for placement?
replies(1): >>45110059 #
benoau ◴[] No.45110059[source]
Bing by itself reportedly doesn't even gross that much, overall $20 billion represents about a quarter of Microsoft's entire annual profit. Microsoft already decided it wasn't viable to spend that much to compete, and the rest of the search market (including AI) need not apply.
replies(2): >>45110129 #>>45110216 #
1. JustExAWS ◴[] No.45110129{6}[source]
And how will it ever if Microsoft won’t invest in it? Microsoft has wasted billions of dollars in other verticals to open revenue streams.