←back to thread

Anthropic raises $13B Series F

(www.anthropic.com)
585 points meetpateltech | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
duxup ◴[] No.45105028[source]
These numbers seem made up at times / difficult to comprehend what they expect is happening ...
replies(7): >>45105155 #>>45105162 #>>45105176 #>>45105213 #>>45105228 #>>45105265 #>>45105305 #
tinyhouse ◴[] No.45105305[source]
This is the fastest-growing company by revenue, jumping from $1B to $3B in just five months. Hitting $10B is only a matter of time, which would put its valuation at a reasonable ~18x sales multiple. It doesn't even matter where we are in the AI hype cycle - AI adoption will keep increasing, it's not even a question at this point.

From a technical perspective, they manage to attract top talent - Google / OpenAI lose a lot of good people to Anthropic. This is important since there are few people who can transform a business (e.g., the guy who built Claude Code). Being attractive for top talent means you're more likely stumble upon them.

replies(3): >>45105370 #>>45105381 #>>45109444 #
aqme28 ◴[] No.45105381[source]
I thought ~20x or so was a good baseline earnings multiple. I have no idea what makes sense as a revenue multiple but I bet it would be a lot lower than that.

Edit: After looking it up, normal P/Sales ratios are on the order of about 1. They vary from like .2 to 8 depending on industry.

replies(2): >>45106157 #>>45109828 #
1. utyop22 ◴[] No.45109828[source]
You're comparing the value of equity to firm earnings? Lol. I don't really bother calling out most financial stuff on here since I can't be bothered but come on.

Its not internally consistent, at all.

replies(1): >>45116228 #
2. aqme28 ◴[] No.45116228[source]
No, I'm calling out the person who is comparing those things.