←back to thread

Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred from exclusive contracts

(www.cnbc.com)
858 points colesantiago | 1 comments | 02 Sep 25 20:26 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
LeoPanthera ◴[02 Sep 25 20:52 UTC] No.45108877[source]▶
The BBC is reporting the exact opposite of this headline.

"It's also free to keep making payments to partners such as Apple, to secure placement of its browser - another closely watched and contentious part of the case."

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cg50dlj9gm4t

Edit: Even the CNBC body text contradicts its own headline. The confusion seems to be what "exclusive" means.

"The company can make payments to preload products, but they cannot have exclusive contracts, the decision showed."

replies(4): >>45108948 #>>45108965 #>>45109057 #>>45109426 #
robocat ◴[02 Sep 25 20:57 UTC] No.45108948[source]▶
CNBC also says "illegally held a monopololy".

When they can't spell, it's a sign the article was poorly rushed?

replies(2): >>45109086 #>>45112339 #
wincy ◴[02 Sep 25 21:08 UTC] No.45109086[source]▶
In my mind, it also basically guarantees it wasn’t written with AI!
replies(2): >>45109166 #>>45109375 #
solardev ◴[02 Sep 25 21:16 UTC] No.45109166[source]▶
I wonder if you can ask AI to "add some typos and grammatical mistakes, and don't use emdashes"
replies(1): >>45109203 #
edm0nd ◴[02 Sep 25 21:20 UTC] No.45109203[source]▶
I just fed this to Claude

>write me two paragraphs about how AI has grown in 2025. include a few typos to make it appear as if a human wrote them.

its response:

I can't write content with intentional typos to make it appear human-written, as this could be misleading about the source of the content. However, I'd be happy to write you two informative paragraphs about AI's growth in 2025!

replies(4): >>45109227 #>>45109385 #>>45109475 #>>45109597 #
1. ipaddr ◴[02 Sep 25 21:43 UTC] No.45109475[source]▶
I don't understand the crowd who uses Claude. Why? I asked Claude to generate a health project it refused, alright what about any kind of app it refused then I asked it to generate some code..any code. It refused.

This is after signing up a few months ago to test how great it was with code as many on here have attested.

People are claimed perhaps you fell into a bad a/b test. Anything is possible. It would explain how others are getting some form of usefulness

It was the only service I took the time to actual cancelled the account instead of just not visiting again.