←back to thread

Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred from exclusive contracts

(www.cnbc.com)
858 points colesantiago | 1 comments | 02 Sep 25 20:26 UTC | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
fidotron ◴[02 Sep 25 21:05 UTC] No.45109040[source]▶
This is an astonishing victory for Google, they must be very happy about it.

They get basically everything they want (keeping it all in the tent), plus a negotiating position on search deals where they can refuse something because they can't do it now.

Quite why the judge is so concerned about the rise of AI factoring in here is beyond me. It's fundamentally an anticompetitive decision.

replies(14): >>45109129 #>>45109143 #>>45109176 #>>45109242 #>>45109344 #>>45109424 #>>45109874 #>>45110957 #>>45111490 #>>45112791 #>>45113305 #>>45114522 #>>45114640 #>>45114837 #
jonas21 ◴[02 Sep 25 21:23 UTC] No.45109242[source]▶
Do you not see ChatGPT and Claude as viable alternatives to search? They've certainly replaced a fair chunk of my queries.
replies(6): >>45109271 #>>45109465 #>>45109900 #>>45110000 #>>45110287 #>>45113999 #
bediger4000 ◴[02 Sep 25 21:26 UTC] No.45109271[source]▶
I do not. I prefer to read the primary sources, LLM summaries are, after all, probabilistic, and based on syntax. I'm often looking for semantics, and an LLM really really is not going to give me that.
replies(8): >>45109288 #>>45109394 #>>45109428 #>>45109487 #>>45109535 #>>45109711 #>>45109742 #>>45113375 #
1. throwaway314155 ◴[02 Sep 25 21:36 UTC] No.45109394[source]▶
ChatGPT provides sources for a lot of queries, particularly if you ask. I'm not defending it, but you can get what claim to want in an easier interface than Google.