←back to thread

Google can keep its Chrome browser but will be barred from exclusive contracts

(www.cnbc.com)
858 points colesantiago | 1 comments | 02 Sep 25 20:26 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
stefan_ ◴[02 Sep 25 20:49 UTC] No.45108847[source]▶
When the stock pops 10% on the announcement you got your antitrust enforcement wrong.
replies(5): >>45108915 #>>45108934 #>>45109305 #>>45109323 #>>45109401 #
xyzzy9563 ◴[02 Sep 25 20:56 UTC] No.45108934[source]▶
Do you think it's better if all companies with competitive moats have a collapse in share price? I'm not really understanding what you're implying here.
replies(1): >>45109001 #
stefan_ ◴[02 Sep 25 21:02 UTC] No.45109001[source]▶
I don't understand. The court has ruled this already a year ago:

> Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly

What should be the effect of antitrust enforcement to a monopolists share price? We are looking at something structural after all.

replies(1): >>45109067 #
xyzzy9563 ◴[02 Sep 25 21:07 UTC] No.45109067[source]▶
Why should shareholders have to suffer just because the Google engineers were good at their job?
replies(4): >>45109108 #>>45109127 #>>45109279 #>>45109843 #
1. GuinansEyebrows ◴[02 Sep 25 21:27 UTC] No.45109279{3}[source]▶
bluntly, because incentives for investors to benefit from anticompetitive practices should be removed, in order to deter those anticompetitive practices. regulation works when you let it.