←back to thread

196 points triceratops | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
Alifatisk ◴[] No.45108766[source]
Good news for China, bad news for US. But don't forget China still emit 16B compared to US who emit 6B tons of CO2

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/pollution...

replies(7): >>45108778 #>>45108786 #>>45108833 #>>45108850 #>>45108988 #>>45109072 #>>45109437 #
notTooFarGone ◴[] No.45108778[source]
So tell me why are you using absolute numbers?
replies(1): >>45108800 #
1. gorwell ◴[] No.45108800[source]
Those are the numbers that matter. Percentages are how you lie with statistics.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-...

replies(3): >>45108821 #>>45108995 #>>45109027 #
2. lotsofpulp ◴[] No.45108821[source]
Globally, the total matters. By country, the per capita matters.
replies(1): >>45108900 #
3. _aavaa_ ◴[] No.45108900[source]
Disagree. What matters is the absolute number, and the direction that number is going in.
4. zzzoom ◴[] No.45108995[source]
What matters is that the US' number keeps growing.
replies(2): >>45109099 #>>45109102 #
5. nerpderp82 ◴[] No.45109027[source]
There is a great book on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Lie_with_Statistics

But you have to know enough statistics to be sneaky with it.

6. ◴[] No.45109099[source]
7. gorwell ◴[] No.45109102[source]
It hasn't. It's been down since 2007 despite increased population.
replies(1): >>45109723 #
8. triceratops ◴[] No.45109723{3}[source]
The article is literally about how it grew this year.