←back to thread

229 points geetee | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tgv ◴[] No.45100192[source]
This makes little sense to me. Ontologies and all that have been tried and have always been found to be too brittle. Take the examples from the front page (which I expect to be among the best in their set): human_activity => climate_change. Those are such a broad concepts that it's practically useless. Or disease => death. There's no nuance at all. There isn't even a definition of what "disease" is, let alone a way to express that myxomatosis is lethal for only European rabbits, not humans, nor gold fish.
replies(15): >>45100256 #>>45100368 #>>45100385 #>>45100399 #>>45100512 #>>45100673 #>>45100711 #>>45100804 #>>45101092 #>>45101484 #>>45103042 #>>45103397 #>>45104046 #>>45108308 #>>45114204 #
dr_dshiv ◴[] No.45100804[source]
Democritus (b 460BCE) said, “I would rather discover one cause than gain the kingdom of Persia,” which suggests that finding true causes is rather difficult.
replies(4): >>45101114 #>>45101663 #>>45102929 #>>45108468 #
1. blueprint ◴[] No.45108468[source]
perhaps in a similar way that it is impossible to directly "observe" a wavefunction without collapsing it into an observale "effect".
replies(2): >>45148053 #>>45152223 #