←back to thread

176 points tosh | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
gchadwick ◴[] No.45108141[source]
The CTO of applications reporting to CEO of applications (who reports to the actual CEO) is kinda weird? I figure you're either the actual CTO or you're not a C-level exec and should have another title. Just more title inflation I guess. Maybe in same way you see VPs of X everywhere in some organizations we'll be starting to see CEO/CTO of X lower and lower down the org chart.
replies(6): >>45108174 #>>45108227 #>>45108304 #>>45109206 #>>45109914 #>>45110739 #
1. neom ◴[] No.45108227[source]
It's signaling P&L responsibilities. It's not that weird, at least not unheard of at all, just that it's typically done through "EVP" - So EVP Applications, VP of Applications Engineering, etc. - I'm guessing that the line items those "C"s who are not Sam are responsible for, are bigger than most F500 executives, and they're using titles to reflect that reality.
replies(1): >>45108524 #
2. swyx ◴[] No.45108524[source]
just gonna point out that Google has done this as well and its not so much title inflation as it is just acknownledging the fact that if the unit they command was a standalone business they would well be worth the CEO/CTO title.
replies(1): >>45110044 #
3. motoxpro ◴[] No.45110044[source]
Yep. CEO of YouTube, Google Cloud, etc.