←back to thread

Anthropic raises $13B Series F

(www.anthropic.com)
585 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
usrnm ◴[] No.45105203[source]
I feel like the money itself makes less and less sense these days. It's just numbers that are becoming increasingly detached from the real world
replies(9): >>45105400 #>>45105471 #>>45105483 #>>45105548 #>>45105579 #>>45105803 #>>45105863 #>>45105974 #>>45106999 #
fullshark ◴[] No.45105400[source]
The real world sees no other opportunities for outsized returns. Too much money chasing too little opportunity.
replies(2): >>45105489 #>>45105724 #
marcosdumay ◴[] No.45105724[source]
That's what wealth inequality does.
replies(2): >>45105804 #>>45105879 #
wagwang ◴[] No.45105879{3}[source]
No that's what low interest rates does
replies(2): >>45105962 #>>45106231 #
Printerisreal ◴[] No.45106231{4}[source]
No that's what PRINTING fiat money does. Low or high interest rates, they print $trillions
replies(3): >>45106493 #>>45106757 #>>45106825 #
arcticbull ◴[] No.45106493{5}[source]
Who's "they"?
replies(1): >>45106748 #
Printerisreal ◴[] No.45106748{6}[source]
Governments, CBs and investment banks. "They" do it and work together to print more.
replies(1): >>45106858 #
arcticbull ◴[] No.45106858{7}[source]
In a centrally banked economy, retail and commercial banks create money when you take out loans. The government doesn't create money except during QE which only happened twice in the US, 2009-2014 and 2020-2021. That's why I was curious what you meant by "they." The Fed has been actively destroying money for the last 4 years.
replies(3): >>45106985 #>>45107050 #>>45107919 #
Printerisreal ◴[] No.45106985{8}[source]
Now explain why government raise the debt limit? other than allowing printing to get fiat money?
replies(1): >>45107072 #
1. arcticbull ◴[] No.45107072{9}[source]
Ah yeah, that's a common misconception.

Deficit spending doesn't create new money. Deficit spending borrows existing money from the population and institutions in exchange for a promise of future government revenues. The Fed does not participate in treasury primary auctions and does not monetize the debt as a means of funding government operations.

If you printed new money to pay for the government, you wouldn't have a debt. That's double-counting. Not to mention the debt is twice as large as the entire money supply so what you're suggesting isn't even physically possible. It would be inflationary to simply print new money to finance spending, which is exactly why it's not done.

[edit] Also the debt limit is a stupid concept that's likely unconstitutional. Congress authorizes spending, meaningful debate over paying for it by adjusting the debt limit likely falls afoul of the 14th amendment's public debt clause. But yeah I mean the debt limit goes up because the government spends more money than it takes in, so it needs to borrow more each year.