←back to thread

163 points miiiiiike | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Workaccount2 ◴[] No.45103567[source]
What's interesting about imgur, and telling of how times changed, was that it was created mostly to fill the gap in unreliable uploading of images to reddit.

Which begs the question: What the hell was reddit doing that they didn't immediately implement an image hosting feature to keep users on the platform? Imgur rose to fame because it was the darling image host of reddit users, and it wasn't long before imgur needed to pay hosting costs and started sucking users away from reddit and into their own "imgurian" sharing hub.

I guess the internet back then was still in the "Open effort to make the internet awesome for everyone" phase, and hadn't yet gotten to the adversarial "Capture users and never let them leave" phase.

replies(15): >>45103630 #>>45103802 #>>45103805 #>>45104036 #>>45104057 #>>45104158 #>>45104190 #>>45104477 #>>45104693 #>>45104738 #>>45105461 #>>45106322 #>>45107845 #>>45110961 #>>45118185 #
jtokoph ◴[] No.45103630[source]
My guess would be cost. I don’t think Reddit had much, if any, revenue at the time and images would likely require orders of magnitude more storage.
replies(3): >>45103759 #>>45103919 #>>45105007 #
koakuma-chan ◴[] No.45103919[source]
Isn't storage cheap? Telegram advertises as free unlimited storage.
replies(2): >>45104096 #>>45105667 #
1. llm_nerd ◴[] No.45105667{3}[source]
Storage multiplies and becomes more expensive once you're replicating across regions, backing up into an eternally growing corpus, and so on.

But the biggest impediment by far were internet transport costs. I mean, they're still onerous for a lot of media-heavy sites, but it was much worse at the time. Offloading that to third parties made an incredible amount of sense.

It's actually kind of bizarre that there is an Imgur "community". I know the operation ran at a massive money-losing proposition for quite some time.