←back to thread

Next.js is infuriating

(blog.meca.sh)
1033 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | 02 Sep 25 06:57 UTC | HN request time: 0.262s | source
Show context
YuukiRey ◴[02 Sep 25 10:04 UTC] No.45101009[source]▶
I 100% agree. I've ran into the same issues, and I would never use Next.js for anything, and I will encourage every team at work to use something else.

In general Next.js has so many layers of abstraction that 99.9999% of projects don't need. And the ones that do are probably better off building a bespoke solution from lower level parts.

Next.js is easily the worst technology I've ever used.

replies(16): >>45101028 #>>45101139 #>>45101375 #>>45101378 #>>45102069 #>>45102103 #>>45102427 #>>45102810 #>>45102903 #>>45103225 #>>45104004 #>>45104045 #>>45105250 #>>45110734 #>>45112201 #>>45126685 #
jbreckmckye ◴[02 Sep 25 11:00 UTC] No.45101378[source]▶
My experience with Next.js are that its rough edges are a feature, not a bug. Everything is geared towards you giving up and just using Vercel's hosting
replies(9): >>45101858 #>>45102115 #>>45102304 #>>45102325 #>>45102348 #>>45102563 #>>45102608 #>>45102624 #>>45111217 #
motorest ◴[02 Sep 25 12:17 UTC] No.45102115[source]▶
> My experience with Next.js are that its rough edges are a feature, not a bug. Everything is geared towards you giving up and just using Vercel's hosting

That is my opinion as well. Things like SSR are forced onto users with a very smooth onboarding, but I'm concerned that in practical terms this perceived smoothness can only persist if the likes of us pay the likes of Vercel for hosting our work.

In some degree I feel the whole React ecosystem might have ended up being captured by a corporation. Hopefully it wasn't. Let's see.

replies(3): >>45103838 #>>45104192 #>>45105382 #
1. WD-42 ◴[02 Sep 25 16:32 UTC] No.45105382[source]▶
It’s already been captured. Check out the docs for creating a new React app on react.dev:

https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app

It throws you straight at Next.js