←back to thread

198 points isaacfrond | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
jl6 ◴[] No.45100453[source]
> As today’s world faces rising sea levels driven by climate change, the researchers hope to shed light on how Stone Age societies adapted to shifting coastlines more than eight millennia ago.

Unfortunately I don't expect there is any particularly reusable solution to be uncovered. Ancient peoples facing rising tides almost certainly just walked a bit inland and built new huts there. They probably thought nothing of it. They were a far more physically mobile culture, without great dependence on immense, immovable infrastructure - nor on rigid land ownership rules.

Our culture's migration will be entirely different.

replies(8): >>45100671 #>>45100889 #>>45101258 #>>45101308 #>>45101527 #>>45102385 #>>45103267 #>>45112302 #
ehnto ◴[] No.45100671[source]
Rigid land ownership seems to be the source of a great deal of our troubles.
replies(2): >>45100925 #>>45101534 #
inglor_cz ◴[] No.45100925[source]
Now try non-rigid land ownership, where land and buildings can be expropriated in the name of nebulous greater good.

Been there, done that, it is worse than the alternative. People will stop cultivating anything, because why bother if a random officer can just take things from you at will.

Western regulations about land appropriation are strict for a reason, and they always require just compensation for a reason. That is the only way to prevent powerful people from just grabbing what they want, cloaking the thieving act in word bubbles about common prosperity.

replies(4): >>45100976 #>>45101245 #>>45102243 #>>45102510 #
diggan ◴[] No.45101245[source]
> Now try non-rigid land ownership, where land and buildings can be expropriated in the name of nebulous greater good.

Maybe there could be some balance instead of "Either everything can be owned, or nothing is!".

It isn't impossible to move cities if it's really needed and someone is footing the bill, even in a democratic Western country that is famously highly regulated, like Sweden. Since a mine in the north is expanding, they have to move the entire city (paid by the mine's operator in this case), building by building, which of course isn't without complaints, but it's a thing that actively being done as we speak. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cde3xp4xlw9o

replies(4): >>45101271 #>>45101336 #>>45102397 #>>45104225 #
1. mc32 ◴[] No.45101336[source]
That’s a limited population being moved for high value resources. This option does not scale for large populations. It’s easier and cheaper to rebuild.