←back to thread

137 points bradt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
danielfalbo ◴[] No.45085276[source]
We just need to go back at reading books in libraries
replies(2): >>45085617 #>>45087293 #
sebastiennight ◴[] No.45087293[source]
I've written a 125,000-word book a year before GPT-3 was a thing.

If this book came out today, in 2025, how would you know that the 420 pages are actually worth your time and not just a bunch of hallucinated LLM slop?

I've been wondering whether Wikipedia and libraries in 2030 will be in a better overall place quality-wise, or will just be overrun.

The last few times I looked for information on YouTube (by typing a keyword phrase or question instead of looking up a specific channel/creator), most of the top results were AI-narrated presentations. Some of those were filled with comments of people correcting obvious mistakes in the content (which as a layperson I would not have seen as mistakes)

replies(2): >>45087778 #>>45089846 #
vadias ◴[] No.45087778[source]
Wikipedia would probably have to deal with its internal politics and frequent-contributor culture before 2030. Wikipedia pages are not too shabby, in expectation. The Wikipedia meta on the other hand is something much less pleasant.
replies(1): >>45096714 #
1. sebastiennight ◴[] No.45096714[source]
It seems like an unrelated issue to the topic at hand, though. I'd rather have difficult human interactions and trustworthy content VS no human interaction and hallucinated content.