←back to thread

693 points jsheard | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.86s | source
Show context
AnEro ◴[] No.45093447[source]
I really hope this stays up, despite the politics involvement to a degree. I think this is a situation that is a perfect example of how AI hallucinations/lack of accuracy could significantly impact our lives going forward. A very nuanced and serious topic with lots of back and forth being distilled down to headlines by any source, it is a terrifying reality. Especially if we aren't able to communicate how these tools work to the public. (if they even will care to learn it) At least when humans did this they knew at some level at least they skimmed the information on the person/topic.
replies(8): >>45093755 #>>45093831 #>>45094062 #>>45094915 #>>45095210 #>>45095704 #>>45097171 #>>45097177 #
geerlingguy ◴[] No.45093831[source]
I've had multiple people copy and paste AI conversations and results in GitHub issues, emails, etc., and there are I think a growing number of people who blindly trust the results of any of these models... including the 'results summary' posted at the top of Google search results.

Almost every summary I have read through contains at least one glaring mistake, but if it's something I know nothing about, I could see how easy it would be to just trust it, since 95% of it seems true/accurate.

Trust, but verify is all the more relevant today. Except I would discount the trust, even.

replies(8): >>45093911 #>>45094040 #>>45094155 #>>45094750 #>>45097691 #>>45098969 #>>45100795 #>>45107694 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.45094040[source]
> I've had multiple people copy and paste AI conversations and results in GitHub issues, emails, etc.,

A growing number of Discords, open source projects, and other spaces where I participate now have explicit rules against copying and pasting ChatGPT content.

When there aren’t rules, many people are quick to discourage LLM copy and paste. “Please don’t do this”.

The LLM copy and paste wall of text that may or may not be accurate is extremely frustrating to everyone else. Some people think they’re being helpful by doing it, but it’s quickly becoming a social faux pas.

replies(4): >>45094727 #>>45094762 #>>45095823 #>>45096892 #
tavavex ◴[] No.45094762[source]
> When there aren’t rules, many people are quick to discourage LLM copy and paste. “Please don’t do this”.

This doesn't seem to be universal across all people. The techier crowd, the kind of people who may not immediately trust LLM content, will try to prevent its usage. You know, the type of people to run Discord servers or open-source projects.

But completely average people don't seem to care in the slightest. The kind of people who are completely disconnected from technology just type in whatever, pick the parts they like, and then parade the LLM output around: "Look at what the all-knowing truth machine gave me!"

Most people don't care and don't want to care.

replies(1): >>45096203 #
1. Aurornis ◴[] No.45096203[source]
They’ll get there. Tech people have been exposed to it longer. They’ve been around long enough to see people embarrassed by LLM hallucinations.

For people who are newer to it (most people) they think it’s so amazing that errors are forgivable.

replies(2): >>45096376 #>>45107709 #
2. simonw ◴[] No.45096376[source]
If anything, I expect this to get worse.

The problem is that ChatGPT results are getting significantly better over time. GPT-5 with its search tool outputs genuinely useful results without any glaring errors for the majority of things I throw at it.

I'm still very careful not to share information I found using GPT-5 without verifying it myself, but as the quality of results go up the social stigma against sharing them is likely to fade.

replies(1): >>45096573 #
3. LtWorf ◴[] No.45096573[source]
I think it's more that google is getting considerably worse
4. fennecbutt ◴[] No.45107709[source]
No, I don't believe they will.