←back to thread

2071 points K0nserv | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
Liftyee ◴[] No.45088530[source]
As other comments have pointed out, this statement (one I 100% support, BTW) is a little naive. I can see how it might be unreasonable to expect companies to publish documentation, build infrastructure, etc. to support running your own code on the hardware you own (which 99% of people will never need to do).

However, I strongly believe that - should one choose to do so - you should not be stopped from jailbreaking, cracking, etc. manufacturer restrictions on the hardware you own. Companies aren't obligated to support me doing this - but why should legislation stop me if I want to try? (You can easily guess my thoughts on the DMCA.)

replies(2): >>45088560 #>>45095109 #
1. inetknght ◴[] No.45095109[source]
> I can see how it might be unreasonable to expect companies to publish documentation, build infrastructure, etc. to support running your own code on the hardware you own (which 99% of people will never need to do).

Did you know that television schematics used to come with the documentation for the TV? Discussed not-too-recently on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26996413