←back to thread

2071 points K0nserv | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kristov ◴[] No.45092413[source]
I think the conversation needs to change from "can't run software of our choice" to "can't participate in society without an apple or google account". I have been living with a de-googled android phone for a number of years, and it is getting harder and harder, while at the same time operating without certain "apps" is becoming more difficult.

For example, by bank (abn amro) still allows online banking on desktop via a physical auth device, but they are actively pushing for login only via their app. I called their support line for a lost card, and had to go through to second level support because I didn't have the app. If they get their way, eventually an apple or google account will be mandatory to have a bank account with them.

My kid goes to a school that outsourced all communication via an app. They have a web version, but it's barely usable. The app doesn't run without certain google libs installed. Again, to participate in school communication about my kid effectively requires an apple or google account.

I feel like the conversation we should be having is that we are sleepwalking into a world where to participate in society you must have an account with either apple or google. If you decide you don't want a relationship with either of those companies you will be extremely disadvantaged.

replies(33): >>45092481 #>>45092502 #>>45092525 #>>45092559 #>>45092576 #>>45092623 #>>45092669 #>>45092781 #>>45092939 #>>45092947 #>>45093038 #>>45093048 #>>45093123 #>>45093260 #>>45093421 #>>45093478 #>>45093537 #>>45093699 #>>45093704 #>>45094027 #>>45095844 #>>45096340 #>>45096654 #>>45097801 #>>45098763 #>>45099066 #>>45100986 #>>45102151 #>>45102555 #>>45103765 #>>45103863 #>>45104157 #>>45105475 #
bluesign ◴[] No.45092669[source]
I think it is kind of levels:

"can't participate in society without a mobile phone" "can't participate in society without internet" "can't participate in society without google"

not sure where is the logical correct threshold making it wrong. because we all accept maybe people not participating without internet.

replies(3): >>45092703 #>>45092765 #>>45101159 #
jackothy ◴[] No.45092765[source]
Clearly the logical threshold is when a single private corporation becomes the gatekeeper to your life. The internet itself is decentralized so that's fine. Mobile phones as a concept is also fine.
replies(1): >>45092990 #
callc ◴[] No.45092990[source]
Almost. Having access to the internet requires a device, or public computer if available. A just society would at least maintain ability to interact with all government services through in-person and through post office. Universal access.
replies(2): >>45093738 #>>45103640 #
account42 ◴[] No.45093738[source]
At least in some countries you can use a public computer at a library or other government-provided institution. I agree that it ideally shouldn't be required though.
replies(2): >>45094642 #>>45098420 #
1. inetknght ◴[] No.45094642{4}[source]
> At least in some countries you can use a public computer at a library or other government-provided institution

...for now, at least.