←back to thread

693 points jsheard | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.87s | source
Show context
deepvibrations ◴[] No.45093169[source]
The law needs to stand up and make an example here, otherwise this will just continue and at some point a real disaster will occur due to AI.
replies(2): >>45093230 #>>45094131 #
koolba ◴[] No.45093230[source]
> The law needs to stand up and make an example here, otherwise this will just continue and at some point a real disaster will occur due to AI.

What does it mean to “make and example”?

I’m for cleaning up AI slop as much as the next natural born meat bag, but I also detest a litigious society. The types of legal action that stops this in the future would immediately be weaponized.

replies(4): >>45093255 #>>45093318 #>>45093445 #>>45093764 #
1. aDyslecticCrow ◴[] No.45093764[source]
If a humam published an article claiming this exact same thing as gemeni, the author could be sued and have a pretty good case.

But when gemeni does it its a "mistake by the algorithm". AI is a used as responsibility diversion machine.

This is a rather harmless example. But what about dangerous medical advice? What about openly false advertising? What about tax evasion? If an AI does it is it okay because nobody is responsibile?

If applying a proper chain of liability on ai output makes some uses of AI impossible; so be it.

replies(2): >>45094039 #>>45094248 #
2. throwawaymaths ◴[] No.45094248[source]
> If a humam published an article claiming this exact same thing as gemeni, the author could be sued and have a pretty good case.

Actually, no. If you published an article where you accidentally copypasta'd text from the wrong email (for example) on a busy day and wound up doing the same thing, it would be an honest mistake, you would be expected to put up a correction and move on with your life as a journalist.

replies(1): >>45103477 #
3. johnecheck ◴[] No.45103477[source]
Actually, yes. In the US, the 'actual malice' standard only applies to 'public figures'. Outside of that, damaging a person's reputation with false statements is defamation regardless of whether it was due to negligence or malice.
replies(1): >>45105373 #
4. ◴[] No.45105373{3}[source]