←back to thread

693 points jsheard | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
deepvibrations ◴[] No.45093169[source]
The law needs to stand up and make an example here, otherwise this will just continue and at some point a real disaster will occur due to AI.
replies(2): >>45093230 #>>45094131 #
koolba ◴[] No.45093230[source]
> The law needs to stand up and make an example here, otherwise this will just continue and at some point a real disaster will occur due to AI.

What does it mean to “make and example”?

I’m for cleaning up AI slop as much as the next natural born meat bag, but I also detest a litigious society. The types of legal action that stops this in the future would immediately be weaponized.

replies(4): >>45093255 #>>45093318 #>>45093445 #>>45093764 #
1. Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.45093318[source]
> The types of legal action that stops this in the future would immediately be weaponized.

As it should; this is misinformation and/or slander. The disclaimer is not good enough. A few years ago, Google and most of the social media was united in fact checking and fighting "fake news". Now they push AI generated information that use authoritative language at the very top of e.g. search results.

The disclaimer is moot if people consider AI to be authoritative anyway.