←back to thread

120 points cl42 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
shubhamjain ◴[] No.45075187[source]
"This tool 10x the productivity of software engineers"

"GREAT! That means we can fire the people who do the actual work, and replace them with MBA robots, who neither understand nor care about making a good product"

Pardon my pessimism, but in my whole career, I have never met a PM who actual did the work of driving the product vision. Most were just middlemen shuttling information between management, marketing, design, and engineering. Thinking that hiring more PMs would increase the output in the age of AI is such a childish fantasy.

replies(13): >>45075310 #>>45075416 #>>45075437 #>>45075471 #>>45075681 #>>45075696 #>>45075754 #>>45075842 #>>45079942 #>>45082590 #>>45084366 #>>45085073 #>>45092999 #
1. DanielHB ◴[] No.45092999[source]
I have had a bad time with PMs and UX designers not actually understanding how the product works _right now_. How can you ask for changes if you don't understand how it works currently?

Like I am saying how the current behavior of the app downright needs a big flowchart to explain and I get asked: "Add X, but keep it working for all existing users" when that means the whole freaking flowcharts needs to be redrawn from scratch. When I suggest to remove some things to make things simpler (because the users don't understand it either) I get denied because it would be too much hassle to communicate the changes.