←back to thread

214 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lpapez ◴[] No.45087294[source]
This article goes completely against my experience so far.

I teach at an internship program and the main problem with interns since 2023 has been their over reliance on AI tools. I feel like I have to teach them to stop using AI for everything and think through the problem so that they don't get stuck.

Meanwhile many of the seniors around me are stuck in their ways, refusing to adopt interactive debuggers to replace their printf() debug habits, let alone AI tooling...

replies(8): >>45087363 #>>45087929 #>>45088042 #>>45088074 #>>45088303 #>>45088412 #>>45088809 #>>45090665 #
quantiq ◴[] No.45090665[source]
Yeah, I'm not putting stock in this at all. The methodology of this survey seems dubious.
replies(1): >>45091364 #
jennyholzer ◴[] No.45091364[source]
30% of the articles on this forum are covert LLM advertising
replies(2): >>45092688 #>>45092841 #
wulfstan ◴[] No.45092688[source]
Good, it's not just me.

I guess it's not a massive surprise given it's an HN forum and a reasonable percentage of HN candidates are doing LLM/AI stuff in recent cohorts, but it still means I have to apply a very big filter every time I open an article and people wax lyrical about how amazing Claude-GPT-super-codez is and how it has made them twice the engineer they were yesterday at the bargain price of $200 a month...

May it all die in a fire very soon. Butlerian jihad now.

replies(1): >>45092766 #
1. jennyholzer ◴[] No.45092766{3}[source]
I agree. Burn the machines-that-think.

To anyone reading, if you work on LLM software, I hope that your business fails.