(www.tomshardware.com)

34 points dmmalam | 1 comments | 01 Sep 25 11:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source

Show context

arccy ◴[01 Sep 25 12:18 UTC] No.45092137[source]▶

>>45091921 (OP) #

how long until we get something like spectre for this...

snickerbockers ◴[01 Sep 25 12:27 UTC] No.45092189[source]▶

I doubt it, based on TFA it looks like it has more in common with multi-issue pipelining and ooe than speculative execution.

replies(3): >>45092435 #>>45092800 #>>45092988 #

1. neuroelectron ◴[01 Sep 25 13:09 UTC] No.45092435[source]▶

>>45092189 #

There's a lot of processor state in each core which would be a great place to hide exploits when the microcode is assuming synced operation between cores.

↑

Intel Patents 'Software Defined Supercore'