←back to thread

335 points ingve | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.442s | source
Show context
owlbite ◴[] No.45083253[source]
So how many gates are we talking to factor some "cryptographically useful" number? Is there some pathway that makes quantum computers useful this century?
replies(9): >>45083492 #>>45083705 #>>45084166 #>>45084245 #>>45084350 #>>45084520 #>>45085615 #>>45085735 #>>45088593 #
Strilanc ◴[] No.45085735[source]
> So how many gates are we talking to factor some "cryptographically useful" number?

Table 5 of [1] estimates 7 billion Toffoli gates to factor 2048 bit RSA integers.

> Is there some pathway that makes quantum computers useful this century?

The pathway to doing billions of gates is quantum error correction. [1] estimates distance 25 surface codes would be sufficient for those 7 billion gates (given the physical assumptions it lists). This amplifies the qubit count from 1400 logical qubits to a million physical noisy qubits.

Samuel Jacques had a pretty good talk at PQCrypto this year, and he speculates about timelines in it [2].

(I'm the author of this blog post and of [1].)

[1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.15917

[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJxENYdsB6c

replies(5): >>45086449 #>>45087996 #>>45088391 #>>45089529 #>>45101520 #
sllabres ◴[] No.45087996[source]
From the talk of Samuel Jacques: Timeline for RSA-2048 at about 2088 (conservative extrapolation) or ~2052 (Moore’s‑law‑style growth)
replies(1): >>45090408 #
throwmeaway222 ◴[] No.45090408[source]
it will be done much faster than that, guessing 2035
replies(1): >>45091880 #
1. cosmic_quanta ◴[] No.45091880[source]
Any insight as to why you think that?
replies(2): >>45092459 #>>45092595 #
2. theoreticalmal ◴[] No.45092459[source]
Their company loses funding if it’s not done by 2036
3. athrowaway3z ◴[] No.45092595[source]
I had a really deep and thoughtful discussion with ChatGPT /s