Like? This isn't explained, I'm curious on why I would want to use it, but this is just an empty platitude, doesn't really give me a reason to try.
Beyond `jj undo` everything else in this thread feels just as complicated as git.
It's kind of like asking "why would I buy a digital camera when my film camera does all the same things? I can already see what the photo will look like when I take it, and developing my own film isn't that much of a hassle", yet film cameras have gone the way of the dodo, except for the occasional nostalgic enthusiast.
Their question is more, "why would I buy a digital camera that takes pictures in a new format that only a few cameras understand? All my tooling, 3rd parties, and other camera I own use the standard format. Even though I can see why the new format has advantages, I am still going to have to use the other format for all these other photos I have to work with, and there aren't equivalent tools in the new format for all these other photos things I need to do. Even if I buy this new camera, I am still going to have to work with the old format, so I'll have to learn how to use two formats now, and get used to two tool chains. Since the existing format is something I am going to have to use either way, how is it worth it for me to have to use two formats?"
So, I claim that Jujutsu actually doesn’t work well with git repositories (and forges) very well, and I would like to see a native one.
The only issue is being in detached HEAD all the time, but in practice it's not a big problem for me.
Most of jj’s stuff is purely local. I woke on GitHub with jj just fine, the only thing people notice is that my autogenerated branch named are a bit odd.