←back to thread

42 points Liwink | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
DaveZale ◴[] No.45088683[source]
why is this stuff legal?

there should be a "black box" warning prominent on every chatbox message from AI, like "This is AI guidance which can potentially result in grave bodily harm to yourself and others."

replies(5): >>45088906 #>>45089060 #>>45089481 #>>45089639 #>>45092721 #
lukev ◴[] No.45088906[source]
That would not help in the slightest, any more than a "surgeon general's warning" helps stop smokers.

The problem is calling it "AI" to start with. This (along with the chat format itself) primes users to think of it as an entity... something with care, volition, motive, goals, and intent. Although it can emulate these traits, it doesn't have them.

Chatting with a LLM is entering a one-person echo-chamber, a funhouse mirror that reflects back whatever semantic region your initial query put it. And the longer you chat, the deeper that rabbit hole goes.

replies(3): >>45088980 #>>45089255 #>>45090045 #
jvanderbot ◴[] No.45088980[source]
Well, hate to be that guy, but surgeons general warnings coincided with significant reduction in smoking. We've just reached the flattening of that curve. After decades of declines.

It's hard to believe that a prominent well - worded warning would do nothing but that's not to say it'll be effective for this.

replies(3): >>45089043 #>>45089104 #>>45090184 #
1. lukev ◴[] No.45089104[source]
Well if that's true, by all means.

But saying "This AI system may cause harm" reads to me as similar to saying "This delightful substance may cause harm."

The category error is more important.