←back to thread

214 points Brajeshwar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
yodsanklai ◴[] No.45087351[source]
Seems about right for me (older developer at a big tech company). But we need to define what it means that the code is AI-generated. In my case, I typically know how I want the code to look like, and I'm writing a prompt to tell the agent to do it. The AI doesn't solve any problem, it just does the typing and helps with syntax. I'm not even sure I'm ultimately more productive.
replies(6): >>45087633 #>>45087699 #>>45087883 #>>45089870 #>>45090395 #>>45090712 #
danielvaughn ◴[] No.45087699[source]
Yeah I’m still not more productive. Maybe 10% more. But it alleviates a lot of mental energy, which is very nice at the age of 40.
replies(9): >>45088209 #>>45088219 #>>45088793 #>>45089316 #>>45089574 #>>45090610 #>>45091064 #>>45091142 #>>45091665 #
nicodjimenez ◴[] No.45088793[source]
What kind of codebases do you work on if you don't mind me asking?

I've found a huge boost from using AI to deal with APIs (databases, k8s, aws, ...) but less so on large codebases that needed conceptual improvements. But at worst, i'm getting more than 10% benefit, just cause the AI's can read files so quickly and answer questions and propose reasonable ideas.

replies(1): >>45088849 #
1. Sl1mb0 ◴[] No.45088849[source]
How are you quantifying that 10% ?