←back to thread

214 points Brajeshwar | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.673s | source
Show context
yodsanklai ◴[] No.45087351[source]
Seems about right for me (older developer at a big tech company). But we need to define what it means that the code is AI-generated. In my case, I typically know how I want the code to look like, and I'm writing a prompt to tell the agent to do it. The AI doesn't solve any problem, it just does the typing and helps with syntax. I'm not even sure I'm ultimately more productive.
replies(6): >>45087633 #>>45087699 #>>45087883 #>>45089870 #>>45090395 #>>45090712 #
ojosilva ◴[] No.45087883[source]
I didn't see much mention of tab-completions in the survey and comments here. To me that's the ultimate coding AI is doing at my end, even though it seems to pass unnoticed nowadays. It's massive LOC (and comments!), and that's were I find AI immensely productive.
replies(3): >>45088063 #>>45088071 #>>45088217 #
ottah ◴[] No.45088071[source]
Don't you have to keep dismissing incorrect auto-complete? For me I have a particular idea in mind, and I find auto-complete to be incredibly annoying.

It breaks flow. It has no idea my intention, but very eagerly provides suggestions I have to stop and swat away.

replies(3): >>45088174 #>>45088190 #>>45091173 #
verdverm ◴[] No.45088174[source]
fwiw, VS Code has a snooze auto complete button. Each press is 5m, a decently designed feature imo
replies(1): >>45088536 #
1. rblatz ◴[] No.45088536[source]
Copilot replacing intellisense is a huge shame. Why get actual auto complete when you can get completely hallucinated methods and properties instead.
replies(1): >>45089659 #
2. RugnirViking ◴[] No.45089659[source]
Does it actually replace it? I can still get intellisense style suggestions on my ides (various jetbrains and visual studio) and it's still just as useful (what can this object do I wonder...)
replies(1): >>45095882 #
3. verdverm ◴[] No.45095882[source]
No it does not replace it. I still get intellisense in VS Code. GP is misinformed