←back to thread

181 points thunderbong | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.415s | source
Show context
afro88 ◴[] No.45083680[source]
Great article, though I'm still reading it as it's a mammoth read!

A side note: as it's been painfully pointed out to me, "vibe coding" means not reading the code (ever!). We need a term for coding with LLMs exclusively, but also reviewing the code they output at each step.

replies(6): >>45083767 #>>45083783 #>>45083935 #>>45083943 #>>45084140 #>>45084335 #
Disposal8433 ◴[] No.45083935[source]
It's called "reviewing code." I'm not taking any kind of responsibility for code that I haven't written myself.
replies(1): >>45086514 #
afro88 ◴[] No.45086514[source]
You're not just hitting go and reviewing code though. If someone asked how I built a side project and I said "reviewing code" it would make no sense.
replies(1): >>45087912 #
1. archargelod ◴[] No.45087912[source]
> If someone asked how I built a side project Then you might have to say the truth: that you didn't build it, but Claude/OpenAI/Gemini built it under your supervision.
replies(1): >>45089028 #
2. afro88 ◴[] No.45089028[source]
Now we're getting somewhere. I think there's more than just supervision involved though. The ideas, direction and design are also provided by the person driving and reviewing output from the agents.