←back to thread

76 points rntn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
amarant ◴[] No.45086858[source]
Why is human fecal matter worse for the environment than animal fecal matter?

Something in our diets?

replies(7): >>45086913 #>>45086925 #>>45087305 #>>45089322 #>>45090105 #>>45090202 #>>45090752 #
SR2Z ◴[] No.45086925[source]
We are apex predators, and our shit contains the condensed toxins from all of the lower rungs on the food chain. The other extreme would be an animal like a cow, which shits basically smellier grass.

That's basically it. A human being that's only eaten plants has much less devastating poops.

replies(2): >>45087200 #>>45087202 #
1. FollowingTheDao ◴[] No.45087202[source]
It is far from a certain that we are apex predators since we can survive on a largely herbivore diet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apex_predator#Human_trophic_le...

And "our shit contains the condensed toxins from all of the lower rungs on the food chain." lacks any credibility unless you can provide a link I have never seen.

replies(2): >>45088694 #>>45089341 #
2. aspenmayer ◴[] No.45089341[source]
> And "our shit contains the condensed toxins from all of the lower rungs on the food chain." lacks any credibility unless you can provide a link I have never seen.

I’m not who you’re asking, but I can only assume that they refer to the observed phenomenon of bioaccumulation, which was factor in the unexpected harms of pesticides such as DDT on bird populations.

That said, I don’t know of any risks to wildlife or the environment from bioaccumulated toxins solely due to human waste. If I am reaching and wildly guessing, I suppose folks who eat a lot of fish might pass more mercury in their waste? From what I understood, most toxins like that are processed by the liver and don’t get flushed out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioaccumulation