←back to thread

153 points breve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
socalgal2 ◴[] No.45081067[source]
I kinda feel like the solution is to stop promoting artist that sign with labels? Like the label doesn’t want you to use the music. the artist chose the label to protect their right's

also, it does seem a little whiny on Beato’s part. He’s not wrong that allowing the music on his channel is probably a net positive for the artist and the label but at the same time he’s benefiting from the music. if he wasn’t then he would be fine with removing it

replies(2): >>45081089 #>>45081118 #
rkachowski ◴[] No.45081089[source]
The music in question would be the music of the artist he's interviewing at the time, the absurdity is that you can interview the creator but not show what they've created.
replies(2): >>45081108 #>>45081123 #
bigyabai ◴[] No.45081123[source]
If the creator gave up their copyright then it's not absurd, it's law. This is why it's important for budding artists to keep their masters.
replies(2): >>45081956 #>>45086663 #
1. kelseyfrog ◴[] No.45086663{3}[source]
The law is absurd. It has no right to exist and runs counter to the laws of reality.