←back to thread

Jujutsu for everyone

(jj-for-everyone.github.io)
434 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | 31 Aug 25 15:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
BeetleB ◴[31 Aug 25 17:25 UTC] No.45084995[source]▶
I had used jj for only a month before I switched back to git for a particular project at work. I felt that jj was *really* nice, but nothing more.

After returning to vanilla git, I was missing the jj convenience within hours.

https://blog.nawaz.org/posts/2025/Aug/the-jujutsu-effect/

replies(2): >>45085022 #>>45085178 #
incognito124 ◴[31 Aug 25 17:28 UTC] No.45085022[source]▶
Something about appreciating only after losing
replies(1): >>45085265 #
ysofunny ◴[31 Aug 25 17:53 UTC] No.45085265[source]▶
also, demonstrating a marked improvement in the experience.

it really does seem like we all gonna be using jj soon enough

I recall pijul.org that was another working prototype of better git

and I wonder how much overlap is there in the way they have made the improvements.

replies(4): >>45085444 #>>45085469 #>>45085608 #>>45085649 #
1. hooper ◴[31 Aug 25 18:30 UTC] No.45085649[source]▶
Jujutsu has "first class conflicts", but it's different from Pijul's "theory of patches". As far as I know, the other big stuff like "working copy is a commit" and the "operation log" (which allows for `jj undo`, safe concurrency, etc) is not present in Pijul. The approaches to Git interop are very different.