←back to thread

134 points christhecaribou | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
Maksadbek ◴[] No.45084620[source]
The sad part is that no one forces you to work that hard. You're free to say NO! and work less, even this will results being laid off. Only during 1:1s your manager may highlight that deadline is soon and would be great if the project would be delivered on time, and little hint about a promo. But you set goals and force yourself to do more, single night this less sleep doesn't hurt anyone. Then there are more such nights of coding and you feel barely alive. 90% work is done, only very little left to finish. And then bam!

Upd:

I didn’t mean that this is ok, I’m for workers rights.

replies(4): >>45084656 #>>45085067 #>>45085089 #>>45085396 #
blitzar ◴[] No.45084656[source]
> The sad part is that no one forces you to work that hard.

You are free to be poor, broke and homeless.

We really need a management class that doesn't insist on continuing the cycle of abuse on their underlings.

replies(5): >>45084745 #>>45085036 #>>45085060 #>>45085088 #>>45085381 #
1. martin-t ◴[] No.45085088[source]
How about removing the hierarchical power structure entirely. The west claims people are all equal and then they happily slave for cents while their "bosses" make dollars.

Worker cooperatives are to corporations what democracies are to dictatorships.

replies(1): >>45085354 #
2. 9rx ◴[] No.45085354[source]
> How about removing the hierarchical power structure entirely.

We, at least those of us in the software industry, tried that. If you look closely, that's what Agile was all about. The associated Twelve Principles of Agile Software outlines what needs to be considered by developers when there isn't a "boss" to oversee operations.

But I'm sure you know how that turned out in practice: The power structure quickly jumped on usurping the name and bastardized it into something that gave them even more power.