←back to thread

155 points kxxt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gethly ◴[] No.45083427[source]
Because those ephemeral LE certificates are such a great idea...
replies(6): >>45083455 #>>45083516 #>>45083798 #>>45083991 #>>45084464 #>>45088393 #
shaky-carrousel ◴[] No.45083516[source]
It is, if your objective is to closely centralize the web. If you make https mandatory, via scare tactics, only people with certificates will have websites. If you make ephemeral certificates mandatory by taking advantage of a monopoly, then only big SSL providers who can afford it will survive.

Then, when you have only two or three big SSL providers, it's way easier to shut someone off by denying them a certificate, and see their site vanish in mere weeks.

replies(6): >>45083645 #>>45083750 #>>45083879 #>>45084701 #>>45086962 #>>45090198 #
KetoManx64 ◴[] No.45083645[source]
Great explanation and very apt for out time when we regularly hear of people being banned/debanked/jailed for their political views in western countries.
replies(2): >>45084760 #>>45086953 #
1. octoberfranklin ◴[] No.45084760[source]
Yeah WebPKI is basically perfectly designed to facilitate deplatforming.