←back to thread

137 points bradt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
djoldman ◴[] No.45084227[source]
> ChatGPT, Google, and its competitors are rapidly diverting traffic from publishers. Publishers are fighting to survive through lawsuits, partnerships, paywalls, and micropayments. It’s pretty bleak, but unfortunately I think the situation is far worse than it seems.

> The article focuses mainly on the publishing industry, news and magazine sites that rely primarily on visits to their sites and selling ads.

I'm not sure where this comes from. The way forward for publishers of content like newspapers is subscription fees and has been for a long time.

The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Economist revenues are subscription fee dominant, for example.

replies(5): >>45084257 #>>45084284 #>>45084322 #>>45084387 #>>45084698 #
add-sub-mul-div ◴[] No.45084284[source]
Who will pay for a subscription fee for journalism if people get trained to receive their information from an opaque tl;dr machine rather than primary sources?
replies(2): >>45084304 #>>45084317 #
tensor ◴[] No.45084304[source]
People want realtime news. AI models don’t have up to the minute information. They need to search for that just like the rest of us, and would be subject to the same paywalls.
replies(1): >>45084371 #
1. add-sub-mul-div ◴[] No.45084371[source]
https://apnews.com/article/grok-4-elon-musk-xai-colossus-14d...

There you go, realtime. As soon as the people you want it to parrot have posted about it.