I'd like to have some clarification what kind of safety level people generally expect from their devices.
As an analogy, consider the different safety expectations of public transport (buses, trains, planes, etc) and individual transport (cars, bikes, scooters, etc).
In public transport, I'm responsible for exactly two things: Choosing the right transport to get on and getting off at the right moment. Everything else is the line operator's fault. The operator is also well within their rights to keep me from unscrewing random panels inside the train, conducting scientific experiments with a plane's onboard WiFi or thrashing the seats when I'm drunk. They can kick me out if I behave too badly. (They can not on arbitrary grounds deny me service if that would trigger anti discrimination protections)
In short, I don't own the train, I don't have any expectations of arbitrary control, but in exchange I do have very high expectations of the service provided, even with very little knowledge of the internal workings of a train.
In contrast, with private transport, I'm much more involved in the technical details of the trip: I have to know the exact route, I have to take every turn myself, I'm expected to know traffic rules and safely interact with other participants and I should at least have a basic knowledge of the internals of my bike or car.
In exchange, I also have much more freedom to modify my transport or to pick a different route.
The question is if the safety expectations for phones are more like the ones of public or of private transport.