←back to thread

266 points amarder | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.431s | source
Show context
userbinator ◴[] No.45077766[source]
If the first item isn't "whitelist JS", you're doing it wrong. So many problems arise from letting any site run programs on your computer that it's best to reserve the privilege to the most trusted of sites.
replies(3): >>45077846 #>>45078131 #>>45083362 #
stusmall ◴[] No.45077846[source]
Meanwhile if I see that I just move on. It just isn't practical to have a workable browser with JS whitelisting for the general case. I doubt people who do this actually do any kind of thoughtful review before hitting "accept". It just adds manual toil with limited benefit.

If they are doing meaningful review, I question how much they actually get done in life.

replies(4): >>45078402 #>>45078915 #>>45079253 #>>45080838 #
Sophira ◴[] No.45080838[source]
When it was developed, uMatrix was a brilliant method of being cautious about what runs, and it had a logger so you could easily see what domains you should enable the current domain to have access to.

I still use it honestly, but I'll need to move on at some point - not just because it's MV2-only, but also I've found a way in which uMatrix can be bypassed if a website were to specifically target it. (It doesn't affect uBlock Origin, although I haven't tested the Lite MV3 version.)

replies(3): >>45083029 #>>45083670 #>>45085884 #
1. SahAssar ◴[] No.45083029[source]
> I've found a way in which uMatrix can be bypassed if a website were to specifically target it

Please do tell.

replies(1): >>45085530 #
2. Sophira ◴[] No.45085530[source]
I've been a bit wary of giving details due to it not getting updated. See my other comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45085342