←back to thread

86 points imsnif | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
1. tiffanyh ◴[] No.45082939[source]
Does anyone else feel uneasy about a terminal extending your desktop/server’s exposure beyond its current attack surface?
replies(1): >>45083112 #
2. mtndew4brkfst ◴[] No.45083112[source]
Very very much so. The project also includes separate binary releases with this feature compiled out altogether, but I'd much rather this sort of feature was never ideated or acted upon in this first place.

Generally speaking I don't want a terminal multiplexer to be doing network IO of any sort, so I also didn't love it when they shipped "load WASM plugins from a non-checksummed arbitrary URL via your config file" in a previous release.