←back to thread

266 points amarder | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
cookiengineer ◴[] No.45080461[source]
This is kind of a stupid ChatGPT article.

No, this will not effectively help to reduce the fingerprint of your Browser.

A LOT more tracking services are integrated into the Firefox browser in various places (like New Tab page, Sync, Pocket, Shavar, Google Safebrowsing, OSCP, etc pp).

I wrote a more detailed article about this, and got an "as good as possible" as a result.

But yeah, please please start to use a Host Firewall where you can block on a per-domain and per-port and per-process basis (like LittleSnitch, OpenSnitch etc) to validate your assumptions. UIs will always lie to you, including the one from Firefox.

[1] https://cookie.engineer/weblog/articles/firefox-privacy-guid...

replies(7): >>45082458 #>>45082927 #>>45083160 #>>45083737 #>>45084270 #>>45085747 #>>45100657 #
1. binaryturtle ◴[] No.45082927[source]
Yes, sadly Little Snitch (or a similar app) is required to tame Firefox. It's a real shame since they use "Privacy" as selling point, but for me that starts with being transparent about what they do behind the users' backs with very clear ways to disable any nonsense (no about:config or policy BS, but proper GUI exposed options), or even better with a proper opt-in to those "security" and comfort features.

It pretty much eroded any trust I had in this browser and Mozilla (they are no more better than Google, Meta, Apple in that regard.) If it wasn't for uBlock Origin and availability for older OSX versions I would ditch it (the Dynasty build is the only option I have for a recent browser on my old Mac.)