←back to thread

153 points breve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bambax ◴[] No.45081136[source]
One answer to this madness is to starve the beast: never buy any music or any content from an established company. Torrent everything. It may not work at all, but at least you can tell yourself you're not helping the bastards.
replies(7): >>45081177 #>>45081207 #>>45081457 #>>45081742 #>>45082396 #>>45084007 #>>45094346 #
rglullis ◴[] No.45081207[source]
Few people are buying anything in this world where streaming is the norm and the labels make money by cutting deals with the distribution platforms.

The solution for me, in this specific case, would be for Beato to act against YouTube and take his channel elsewhere. He has enough followers to be able to start his own Peertube server, find a few sponsors and keep going forever.

replies(4): >>45081459 #>>45081623 #>>45082318 #>>45082382 #
0xDEAFBEAD ◴[] No.45082318[source]
What does Youtube have to do with it? This appears to be a story about Universal Music Group. Stop featuring their artists, and tell anyone on that label to move to a different label if they want to be featured on the channel.
replies(1): >>45082547 #
rglullis ◴[] No.45082547[source]
Who gets to "demonitize" the videos? YouTube.

Who gets to process the copyright strike and tell creators they need to remove the content in order to not have consequences? YouTube.

Who gets to close down the channel even before any lawsuit against a copyright allegation is conducted? YouTube.

Beato is fighting BMG because he sees YouTube as the hand that feeds him, but he could get rid of all the BMG annoyances if he was brave enough to own his distribution channel.

replies(2): >>45082751 #>>45082961 #
1. AstralStorm ◴[] No.45082751[source]
YouTube could be subjected to a class action in theory not in practice, because the terms of the site are so loose you can get ejected with no recourse and lose wages, while indemnifying them.

UMG however has not any relationship with the author so they actually can be sued. If they hate their subcontractor YouTube for it, that's their problem.

They're the legal entity on behalf of which blocking is done, after all.