←back to thread

205 points ColinWright | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
anfilt ◴[] No.45081577[source]
The owner of a device should have the final say. The way a lot of this is set up basically deprives the owner of one of their core property rights, in particular the right of exclusion. Instead, in many systems the decision about what software to include or exclude is made cryptographically by a third party rather than by the device’s owner. I don’t think we should support limiting people’s property rights for “safety” or other reasons. iOS is probably one the worst in this regard and it sad to see android moving more and more towards this direction.

I have posted multiple times before that this effectively limits people’s property rights. Here are some other posts I have made on the subject:

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39349288

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39236853

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35067455

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40727203

replies(3): >>45082440 #>>45082499 #>>45082521 #
1. makeitdouble ◴[] No.45082499[source]
> I have posted multiple times before that this effectively limits people’s property rights. Here are some other posts I have made on the subject:

This is crazy long and not directly about the iPhone, but this is the most comprehensive explaination I've heard of why your plea will probably never be heard:

https://youtu.be/ZK742uBTywA?si=poDXl3Mz7lYwdUxa0

(TLDR: international treaties)