←back to thread

Nokia’s legendary font makes for a great user interface font

(www.osnews.com)
318 points rguiscard | 1 comments | 30 Aug 25 12:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
jarym ◴[30 Aug 25 13:02 UTC] No.45074279[source]▶
Anyone know what the license situation would be around using this font e.g. on a commercial website?
replies(1): >>45074434 #
wizzwizz4 ◴[30 Aug 25 13:21 UTC] No.45074434[source]▶
Typefaces do not have copyright (though they can have design rights or trademark encumberment). Font files, the computer programs that implement typefaces, are protected by copyright and must be licensed.
replies(2): >>45075028 #>>45080022 #
NoMoreNicksLeft ◴[31 Aug 25 03:07 UTC] No.45080022[source]▶
What if I write a tool that pulls all the vectors out of a font file, puts them in a new font file with a new font id/name, munges it up so they don't have the same hash?

Shapes aren't software, and whatever fool judicial ruling set that precedent is ripe for some loopholing.

replies(1): >>45082463 #
1. wizzwizz4 ◴[31 Aug 25 11:51 UTC] No.45082463[source]▶
Then your font will look awful, because there's a lot more to fonts than just the glyphs. (See the lettering on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pope_Francis_Tomb.jp..., in the lower third of the image.) You cannot adapt the font's kerning or hinting software in this way, since that would be creating a derivative work: you'd have to take measurements from its output and reconstruct it that way, which is rather difficult to do without understanding.

The ruling is not foolish: it's actually one of the more sensible aspects of copyright law imo.