Are people's bosses making them use AI tools?

(piccalil.li)

118 points soraminazuki | 1 comments | 31 Aug 25 02:47 UTC | HN request time: 0.28s | source

Show context

AlexandrB ◴[31 Aug 25 05:16 UTC] No.45080550[source]▶

LLMs are the first technology I've experienced where there's a lot of top-down pressure to adopt it ASAP. Most other technologies in my career, like VCS or static analysis or whatever else were championed by colleagues or peers.

replies(9): >>45080601 #>>45080779 #>>45080900 #>>45080901 #>>45080907 #>>45081086 #>>45081140 #>>45081538 #>>45082488 #

wiml ◴[31 Aug 25 07:28 UTC] No.45081140[source]▶

>>45080550 #

I've seen it before. Adopting Windows Server or IIS. Choosing Oracle for your RDBMS. That kind of thing. It has all the hallmarks of a decision based on a salesguy's pitch with no technical evaluation.

replies(1): >>45082441 #

1. danaris ◴[31 Aug 25 11:45 UTC] No.45082441[source]▶

>>45081140 #

I agree that it looks like a mandate due to a sales pitch, but there's a difference between the higher-ups mandating adoption of a particular brand of a more generic technology—eg, choosing IIS over Apache, or Oracle over MySQL—and mandating the technology itself, when it's not something that's already required for the project (as a webserver is for a website).

While this isn't a completely unprecedented situation, it's definitely much less common than just having to use the Big Corporate version of a tech stack rather than an open source version of same just because it came bundled with the package your CEO got sold.

↑