←back to thread

215 points XzetaU8 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.379s | source
Show context
ggm ◴[] No.45081331[source]
Remarkable hostility and strange circular logic from some people posting here. Clearly belief outstrips evidence.

If research suggests there's an observable asymptotic trend, public health dollars at the very least might be better spent on quality of life as much as quantity.

The posts saying an atom of oxygen is potentially infinitely long lived (ignoring radioactive decay?) As a "proof" that life extension has no limit is about as reductively silly as it is possible to be.

Bills of mortality bootstrapped Financial investment in annuities. You think the money people aren't tracking this trend now, when they have for the last 400 or more years?

replies(8): >>45081536 #>>45082290 #>>45082412 #>>45082509 #>>45082701 #>>45082940 #>>45083066 #>>45083913 #
1. StopDisinfo910 ◴[] No.45082412[source]
> If research suggests there's an observable asymptotic trend, public health dollars at the very least might be better spent on quality of life as much as quantity.

Isn’t that already the case with a ton of research going into cancer treatment, Alzheimer’s treatment and how to keep people healthy longer?

Honestly, having seen the life of my grand parents once they past 90 and especially the last 2 when they had significant dementia, I would much rather die before.

Give me a good life as long as possible and spare me and my family the worst of the decline.