←back to thread

Rick Beato is right to rant about music copyright strikes

(savingcountrymusic.com)
153 points breve | 1 comments | 31 Aug 25 05:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.233s | source
Show context
rsp1984 ◴[31 Aug 25 08:35 UTC] No.45081515[source]▶
It gets even crazier when compared to other IP law:

Engineer makes an invention: Write 30-Page patent application. Multi-year patenting process with USPTO, pay 1000s of $ if DIY, 10x that if using an IP law firm. Multiply by 4x if going international. With luck, patent gets issued 3 years later. It protects you for 25 years, but only if you have deep pockets for an IP lawsuit in case someone does copy you -- and with uncertain outcome.

Artist releases a song: automatically enjoys 100+ years of protection, even for minor samples, hooks, melodic elements. Lawsuits are easily won as long as you can prove you are the copyright holder.

I have my theories about how we ended up in this state of affairs but no jurist with a sliver of common sense can seriously claim that this is fine.

replies(6): >>45081831 #>>45081837 #>>45081840 #>>45081915 #>>45082041 #>>45082217 #
stevage ◴[31 Aug 25 10:23 UTC] No.45082041[source]▶
And clothing designer...there is no copyright, suck it up.
replies(3): >>45082157 #>>45082350 #>>45082357 #
1. JdeBP ◴[31 Aug 25 11:28 UTC] No.45082357[source]▶
Outwith the U.S.A. there is a thing called a design right that applies to that.

In the U.K., the design right took its initial form in 1787 and applied to printed patterns on fabrics; so it has been on point for clothing design for over 230 years. (-: