(lwn.net)

215 points ksec | 1 comments | 30 Aug 25 13:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.21s | source

Show context

LeoPanthera ◴[30 Aug 25 17:28 UTC] No.45076431[source]▶

It's orphaned in Debian as well, but I'm not sure what significant advantages it has over btrfs, which is very stable these days.

replies(1): >>45076586 #

betaby ◴[30 Aug 25 17:47 UTC] No.45076586[source]▶

>>45076431 #

btrfs was unusable in multi disk setup for kernels 6.1 and older. Didn't try since then. How's stable btrs today in such setups?

Also see https://www.phoronix.com/news/Josef-Bacik-Leaves-Meta

replies(5): >>45076637 #>>45076834 #>>45076978 #>>45076998 #>>45081574 #

1. procaryote ◴[31 Aug 25 08:48 UTC] No.45081574[source]▶

>>45076586 #

If you don't trust btrfs raid it's perfectly possible to run btrfs on top of lvm or mdadm raid. Then you have btrfs in a prety happy case single device mode. Also the recovery tooling is more well known and tested

↑

Bcachefs Goes to "Externally Maintained"