←back to thread

205 points ColinWright | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.619s | source
Show context
isodev ◴[] No.45081510[source]
I think the premise that app stores, notarisarion and such protect users is false. It’s like saying sunglasses protect you from the sun - they help you not get blinded by it right away, but you still need sunscreen, wear a hat etc.

Apple/Google rejecting some obvious scam apps doesn’t mean people don’t get scammed or hurt in other ways. Just like online age verification doesn’t actually protect children or make you a better parent… its just straw man of sorts, designed to remove agency from users through a false sense of safety.

replies(2): >>45081563 #>>45082333 #
1. tim333 ◴[] No.45081563[source]
The iphone system protects people fairly well at the stuff it's designed for, ie installing malware. Obviously sunglasses don't stop you needing sunscreen and the app store doesn't protect me from crashing my car etc.
replies(1): >>45081766 #
2. gf000 ◴[] No.45081766[source]
Yeah, and banning cars would also protect people from car crashes.

But it comes with the rather large price of a huge limitation to my personal choices.

replies(1): >>45081810 #
3. jbverschoor ◴[] No.45081810[source]
Not having mandatory checks and requirement would result in the market being flooded with unsafe cars