←back to thread

282 points tobr | 10 comments | | HN request time: 1.056s | source | bottom
1. nilsherzig ◴[] No.45081279[source]
Does not render properly on iOS mobile (iOS 26 beta) https://files.nilsherzig.com/IMG_9236.PNG
replies(3): >>45081290 #>>45081419 #>>45081765 #
2. nilsherzig ◴[] No.45081290[source]
I should really add some enumeration protection to these image sharing urls haha
replies(1): >>45081974 #
3. grues-dinner ◴[] No.45081419[source]
Also not on Firefox: https://imgur.com/a/fkaQeIp
replies(1): >>45081471 #
4. TristanDaCunha ◴[] No.45081471[source]
Same result on Firefox mobile
replies(1): >>45081618 #
5. nilsherzig ◴[] No.45081618{3}[source]
only got the working on chrome desktop https://files.nilsherzig.com/screenshots/2025-0831-105623-64...
replies(1): >>45082466 #
6. DonHopkins ◴[] No.45081765[source]
A mobile screen is not wide enough anyway!
replies(2): >>45082282 #>>45082955 #
7. nilsherzig ◴[] No.45081974[source]
https://files.nilsherzig.com/screenshots/IMG_9239.png

The difference between posting an image url without and with a random string in the url.

Blue line is successful requests (people viewing the image I posted), green are unsuccessful requests (people trying to find other files).

Second blue bump is the screenshot with a randomized „hard“ to guess url. First bump the default iOS screenshot name in the url.

8. omgtehlion ◴[] No.45082282[source]
It's not mobile, it is IE6 era all over again, when sites are designed and work only in one (dominant) browser :(
9. carterschonwald ◴[] No.45082466{4}[source]
Oh!!! Thx. This makes way more sense
10. stavros ◴[] No.45082955[source]
Works fine on my phone, since it was vertical.