←back to thread

118 points soraminazuki | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.832s | source | bottom
1. balder1991 ◴[] No.45080635[source]
My company literally built its own ChatGPT Enterprise wrapper and forced us all to make X prompts in it per week. If we don’t meet that quota, our immediate leader will “strongly suggest” we do it or we might get a bad performance review eventually. It’s also tied to our yearly bonus now.
replies(4): >>45080646 #>>45080670 #>>45080772 #>>45082774 #
2. 01HNNWZ0MV43FF ◴[] No.45080646[source]
Just a few years ago I got in trouble for wasting the company bot's time trying to make it play Zork with me over lunch break
3. randycupertino ◴[] No.45080670[source]
We have had a huge push for mandatory ChatGPT use as well at my 800 person company - 4 mandatory IT trainings about it, told how much we use it will be factored into our performance reviews, hyped up by management at all-hands, told if we don't use it we will be outperformed by those who do.

I am curious if they read what we're prompting into the system and considering our use case as well.

replies(1): >>45080739 #
4. consp ◴[] No.45080739[source]
This sounds like an interesting case for letting the LLM chat with itself by opening two instances and doing malicious compliance.
5. dylanowen ◴[] No.45080772[source]
Sounds like a great way to script yourself a bonus
replies(2): >>45081420 #>>45081443 #
6. krackers ◴[] No.45081420[source]
And you could even ask chatGPT to generate a set of prompts and the API calls for you!
7. bitwize ◴[] No.45081443[source]
"I'm gonna proompt myself a minivan"
8. ulfw ◴[] No.45082774[source]
Its okay. You're going to be laid off thanks to this newfound 'efficiency' soon anyways.

That's the whole point